There is a war going on. There is a war going on that is much more insidious than the likes of physical and racial violence. There is a war going on to control not just our behaviors and lives, but our thoughts. This is a harsh reality to swallow, only if we have no solution. There is a solution, but first we must understand the nature of the problem that is infecting and affecting our world and our minds.<\/p>\n
The American Thinker article by Taylor Lewis, dated 21 September 2017, discusses the realities that are unfolding in America and infect in the world today - where \"a totalitarian vision, demanding control over not just your behavior, but your thoughts and beliefs. This as the price of simply living without being attacked.\"<\/p>\n
Last year, Erickson released a book with a title he popularized: You Will Be Made to Care: The War on Faith, Family, and Your Freedom to Believe.<\/em> The book is a summation of an argument Erickson has long made. As the sexual left makes progress on its biggest projects -- same-sex marriage, transgenderism acceptance, pronoun wordplay -- they are increasingly unwilling to brook resistance.<\/p>\n
Do you believe in traditional marriage but don\u2019t care that gays marry? Think it\u2019s OK teenagers take hormonal injections to swap genders but it\u2019s not right for your kids? Don\u2019t really give a hoot about someone who identifies as \u201cxe\u201d?<\/p>\n
Well, too bad, sucker. The new dispensation doesn\u2019t care for your waffling. Going forward, your private beliefs must align with your public stance. No exceptions made or allowed.<\/strong><\/p>\n
In short: You will be made to care<\/strong><\/p>\n
Erickson\u2019s warning was just vindicated in a tweetstorm by Zack Ford, the flamboyant correspondent for the liberal blog ThinkProgress.<\/p>\n
Ford, who is prone to pique-filled tantrums, is the site\u2019s LGBTQ editor. His beat consists of sniffing out any hint of pro-heterosexual bias and lambasting it as bigoted, backwards, and tyrannical. He\u2019s a proud atheist who doesn\u2019t hesitate to cite science when it\u2019s convenient. But, nota bene, he believes men menstruate and become pregnant.<\/p>\n
In response to an essay by Bethany Mandel in The Federalist, Ford had a bigger meltdown than Sex in the City fans when Mr. Big dumped Carrie at the altar. In her piece, Mandel admitted to once being a supporter of gay marriage, but the liberals\u2019 Torquemada-inspired campaign for transgenderism inclusion among children has changed her mind. Feeling hoodwinked, Mandel pointedly wrote, \u201cThe Left has shown the totalitarian manner in which it exacts support, or at least silence, from everyday Americans.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ford wasn\u2019t having any of it, no siree. Even though Mandel was an \u201cally\u201d during the fight for same-sex marriage, her opinion that grates upon the \u201cApproved Position\u201d on transgenderism is hereby invalid. \u201cWhat [Mandel] argues that [sic] she should be ALLOWED to believe what she believes, even though those odious beliefs harm others,\u201d Ford tweeted. \u201cIndeed,\u201d our hysterical scribe continued, \u201cshe is a quintessential example of claiming free speech to justify her bigotry.\u201d<\/p>\n
Then came the kicker: \u201cYou'll be \u2018made to care,\u2019 because intolerance harms people and is unjustified and the rest of us want the world to be a better place.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ford tweeted this outburst without a hint of self-awareness or irony. Yes, Mandel also cited the famed Erickson phrase in her criticism. But that a prominent liberal writer actually evoked it, giving full approval to its thought police connotations, is quite stunning.<\/p>\n
Lenin, eat your heart out.<\/p>\n
It just goes to show that well-meaning conservatives who were willing to concede the culture war in the hopes the Left would cease marching forward were hopelessly wrong. Waving the white flag was never going to be a suitable compromise. Liberals aren\u2019t satisfied with open-ended sexual rights; they want the complete eradication of bourgeois convention.<\/p>\n
How did we get to the point where 8-year-old cross-dressers are celebrated as norms-smashing pioneers and not odd (and mentally ill) quirks?<\/p>\n
Like his campus-tied intellectual colleagues, Ford is guilty of what Jonathan Haidt calls \u201cconcept creep.\u201d In a recent interview with spiked, Haidt described how the psychological term has become the Excalibur of social justice warriors: \u201cWhen a word like \u2018violence\u2019 is allowed to creep so that it includes a lot of things that are not violence, then this causes a cascade of bad effects.\u201d<\/p>\n
For decades, university intellectuals have stretched the terms \u201coppression\u201d and \u201cviolence\u201d like rubber bands, trying to fit them over more gentle concepts like \u201cdisagreement\u201d and \u201cdialogue.\u201d The slow creep eventually worked; hundreds of thousands of students graduate college every year believing words truly constitute aggression.<\/p>\n
Ford completely buys into the notion that a person\u2019s private belief represents \u201charm\u201d to others. Worse, in strict Manichean terms, he positions himself as someone who wants \u201cthe world to be a better place,\u201d and Mandel, accordingly, as someone who pushes death and destruction.<\/strong><\/p>\n
The terms of war can\u2019t be any clearer. For traditionalists, being left alone to think, worship, gather, and evangelize in private is not an option. The logic of the Left doesn\u2019t allow for empty spaces. If there is one corner of the brain that still holds fast to outlandish beliefs like marriage was made for man and woman, your chromosomes determine your gender, race is a biological reality, or countries have the right to determine and enforce their borders,then it must be reprogrammed or wiped out.<\/strong><\/p>\n
Just ask Tim Farron, the former leader of the Liberal Democrats party in Britain. A long-time supporter of same-sex marriage, once it was discovered he was a closeted Christian, the press wouldn\u2019t relent. Journalists were dying to know if Farron thought gay sex -- sodomy, in Dantean terms -- was a sin. Farron begged for his own private conscience, but it was to no avail. He was forced to resign from his position last month, saying it was impossible to be a faithful Christian and a politician of prominence.<\/p>\n
And so another trophy for undaunted Left. In the liberal view, a society isn\u2019t free until the last breadcrumbs of bigotry are swept away. A sincere leftist accepts no moderation.<\/p>\n
When they\u2019re as candid as Zack Ford, at least faithful conservatives know where we stand: blindfolded, on the firing line.<\/p>\n
Source: \/\/www.americanthinker.com\/articles\/2017\/09\/your_beliefs_are_no_longer_allowed.html<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Possibilities for Consideration: Repeating History<\/h2>\n
History doesn't repeat itself, we repeat history. <\/em>When\u00a0we blindly and passively allow hate to perpetuate in our refusal to take responsibility or accountability for stopping an injustice that doesn't affect us directly or is not a threat to one's immediate safety, are we merely repeating the mistakes of the Germans, The Romans and the Greeks?<\/p>\n
Add Your Insight: Then They Came For Me...<\/h2>\n
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out\u2014<\/em><\/strong>
\n Because I was not a Socialist.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nThen they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out\u2014<\/em><\/strong>
\n Because I was not a Trade Unionist.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nThen they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out\u2014<\/em><\/strong>
\n Because I was not a Jew.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nThen they came for me\u2014and there was no one left to speak for me.<\/em><\/strong>
\nMARTIN NIEM\u00d6LLER<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"