{"id":42952,"date":"2021-08-10T20:08:26","date_gmt":"2021-08-11T03:08:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pocketwisdominsights.com\/pwicolab\/?p=42952"},"modified":"2021-08-19T00:16:59","modified_gmt":"2021-08-19T07:16:59","slug":"from-their-lips-poison","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pocketwisdominsights.com\/pwicolab\/community\/pwi-co-lab-staff\/from-their-lips-poison\/","title":{"rendered":"From Their Lips, Poison"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Subjugate the Enemy<\/h2>\n

Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence.<\/em>
SUN TSU, The Art of War<\/em> <\/p>\n

A WhatsApp message in response to a UN article titled, Use of religious beliefs to justify rights violations must be outlawed says UN expert,<\/em> has been widely circulated and has attracted the attention of Christian news analysis site, INcontext International<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The UN article<\/a> was originally published March 2, 2020 and it contains alarming statements from Ahmed Shaheed, UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief<\/a>. <\/p>\n

\n

I firmly reject any claim that religious beliefs can be invoked as a legitimate \u2018justification\u2019 for violence or discrimination against women, girls or LGBT+ people the right to freedom of religion protects individuals and not religions as such.<\/p>\n

https:\/\/news.un.org\/en\/story\/2020\/03\/1058411<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

An emotionally charged response to the UN article was published January 15, 2021 by The Defender Newspaper and reposted on jellyfish.news<\/a>. Titled, UN declares his enemy of the church<\/em>, this response to the UN article has been widely circulated in the WhatsApp community. <\/p>\n

\n

The UN says that the Christian Church is the enemy of human rights. The UN says that it will become a world religion to impose humanitarian laws, not spiritual so that the world is not subject to Christian doctrine so that they cannot impose their spiritual laws.<\/p>\n

https:\/\/jellyfish.news\/un-declares-his-enemy-of-the-church\/<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Due to the article's level of redistribution and its plain language description of the UN's intended path forward, it was examined and fact-checked <\/em>by incontextinternational.org<\/a>, which labels the message as \"false.\"<\/p>\n

\n

A WhatsApp message is currently doing the rounds, which claims that the United Nations (UN) has declared the Christian Church an enemy. The message, sent without a name, has a link attached to it titled: Use of religious beliefs to justify rights violations must be outlawed says UN expert. <\/em><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.incontextinternational.org\/2021\/02\/10\/un-declares-the-christian-church-an-enemy\/<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This article seeks to make sense of the brief chain of reactions stemming from the UN article titled, Use of religious beliefs to justify rights violations must be outlawed says UN expert<\/em>. <\/p>\n

Just as an old police officer once told me, \"There are three sides to every story \u2013 the claimant, the defendant, and the truth.\" this article seeks to identify the truth.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Disprove a Lie<\/h2>\n

A lie, by definition, is indefensible and cannot be disproven. A lie is not necessarily saying something that isn't true, it is influencing <\/em>somebody to think or believe something other than the WHOLE truth (all<\/em> the facts). Pieces of truth plus the omission of facts still constitutes a lie.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"
https:\/\/news.un.org\/en\/story\/2020\/03\/1058411<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Before we examine the UN article at the center of this discussion, it is important to understand the intentions and motivating forces behind the UN's actions and communications. A quick look at Agenda 21<\/em>, the global plan adopted by the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development on 14 June 1992, paints a clear picture.<\/p>\n

The UN agenda and intentions, which were originally announced in their Agenda 21<\/em> literature, follow the direction of one-world, totalitarian, single governing body control <\/strong>over all <\/em>inhabitants of the earth. This literature has been updated with new verbiage over the years as the reaction to it from those who took the time to read and interpret the meaning within its 400-pages was great alarm, distrust, and anger. <\/p>\n

The words used are agreeable, desirable, and even pleasant, but the means by which to achieve the described outcomes are vaguely discussed and are typically wrought through the exertion of ever-increasing control-over individuals and social engineering to ensure the control goes unchallenged.<\/p>\n

\"social justice\"<\/p>\n

\"human rights\"<\/p>\n

\"gender equality\"<\/p>\n

\"Sustainable Development\"<\/p>\n

\"Peace, dignity and equality on a healthy planet\"<\/p>\n

Now called the UN Sustainable Development Goals<\/em>, the underlying intentions of Agenda 21 remain as the driving force for \"global sustainability.\"<\/p>\n

A Reference.com article titled, What is \"Agenda 21 for Dummies?\" <\/em>summarizes the intentionally obfuscating legal-speak of the UN literature into clear layman's terms.<\/p>\n

\n

Agenda 21 for Dummies is an explanation in layman\u2019s terms of an alleged conspiracy stemming from a 1987 U.N. initiative to study environmental and population development.<\/strong> It exposes an official policy that has been adopted by 178 nations, including the United States, to impose a global socialism<\/mark>.<\/p>\n

The goal of Agenda 21 is to reduce the consumption of resources, maintain and restore biodiversity and increase social equity through a program of sustainable development. The means to accomplish these goals is through the integration of social, economic and environmental resources. The plan requires that every level of community and local government adopt the principles of sustainable development to carry them to every individual.<\/p>\n

Implementation involves the creation of a perceived international emergency fueled by an economic and environmental crisis, control of the media, universal disarmament to entrust all weapons to a central authority, and the redistribution of resources and wealth. The result is a global society which accepts social justice as the right of all individuals to benefit equally from the resources provided by society and the environment, and the rights of personal freedom and private ownership no longer exist.<\/strong><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.reference.com\/world-view\/agenda-21-dummies-5864812f95565e24<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Did you see that last part: \"...and the rights of personal freedom and private ownership no longer exist<\/em><\/strong>.\" <\/p>\n

That should be very alarming to any freedom-loving individual or to anyone who owns something that doesn't want to give it to their government for expert management <\/em>and\/or equitable redistribution<\/em>.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Hoaxology<\/h2>\n

Hoaxology is the INcontext International category for published content which is interpreted by their staff to be misrepresentative of the truth as they see it. The WhatsApp message in response to the UN article titled, Use of religious beliefs to justify rights violations must be outlawed says UN expert,<\/em> falls into this category.<\/p>\n

The Hoaxology de-bunking <\/em>article begins by reviewing the claims made in the WhatsApp message:<\/p>\n

\n

Message claims<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n