Opening Insights
In 1984 George Orwell wrote:
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.
The realities of the fight for dominance within the technology arena continue to be revealed. Regulators attempt to control violations of privacy, morality and ethics, yet it appears that some technology giants are: too big to fail. The Independent article by Foo Yun Chee Brussels, published on June 2, 2017 explores the pressure that Google faces from US and European competitors and regulators. This may be an early attempt to stop Google's guerrilla-like behavior and encroaching monopoly of online shopping and information resources.
Informational Insights
EU antitrust regulators aim to slap a hefty fine on Alphabet unit Google over its shopping service before the summer break in August, two people familiar with the matter said, setting the stage for two other cases involving the US company.
The European Commission's decision will come after a seven-year investigation into the world's most popular internet search engine was triggered by scores of complaints from both US and European rivals.
The EU competition authority accused Google in April 2015 of distorting internet search results to favour its shopping service, harming both rivals and consumers.
The Commission and Google declined to comment. The US company has in the past rejected the charges, saying that regulators ignored competition from online retailers Amazon and eBay.
Fines for companies found guilty of breaching EU antitrust rules can reach 10 per cent of their global turnover, which in Google's case could be about $9bn of its 2016 turnover.
Apart from the fine, the Commission will tell Google to stop its alleged anti-competitive practices but it is not clear what measures it will order the company to adopt to ensure that rivals get equal treatment in internet shopping results.
The regulator could set out general principles or specific instructions for Google to follow, said an observer.
The Commission's tough line is in sharp contrast with the US Federal Trade Commission which settled its own web search case with the company in 2013 by requiring Google to stop “scraping” reviews and other data from rival websites for its own products.
Google made three unsuccessful attempts to settle the case with the previous European Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia in a bid to stave off a possible fine and a finding of wrongdoing.
Mr Almunia's successor Margrethe Vestager, however, has shown no willingness to settle with Google.
The company has also been charged with using its Android mobile operating system to squeeze out rivals and with blocking competitors in online search advertising related to its “AdSense for Search” platform.
The platform allows Google to act as an intermediary for websites such as online retailers, telecoms operators or newspapers. The Commission has warned of massive fines in both cases.
Source: //www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/google-eu-fine-search-9-billion-search-results-rigging-alphabet-shopping-service-a7768621.html
Possibilities for Consideration
- How do we see the realities of the problem, without terror?
- How do we hear the realities of the problem, without fear?
- How do we find a way to speak up, unify and find answers and implementable solutions to secure our freedoms before they are striped from us?
- How do we learn to assess and discern the short-term and long-term effects of Google's continued positioning to control information and direct our access to resources?
Add Your Insight
Laws control the lesser man...
Right conduct controls the greater one.
MARK TWAIN